TSTP Solution File: ITP071^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ITP071^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LN7rQHoBDY true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:22:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 11 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 5 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 43 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 ^; 7 !; 0 ?; 7 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tree_a_type,type,
tree_a: $tType ).
thf(produc143150363Tree_a_type,type,
produc143150363Tree_a: $tType ).
thf(a_type,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(is_heap_a_type,type,
is_heap_a: tree_a > $o ).
thf(heapIm837449470Leaf_a_type,type,
heapIm837449470Leaf_a: tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a ).
thf(e_a_type,type,
e_a: tree_a ).
thf(product_snd_a_Tree_a_type,type,
product_snd_a_Tree_a: produc143150363Tree_a > tree_a ).
thf(produc686083979Tree_a_type,type,
produc686083979Tree_a: a > tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a ).
thf(t_a_type,type,
t_a: a > tree_a > tree_a > tree_a ).
thf(v_type,type,
v: a ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
is_heap_a @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( is_heap_a @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl62,plain,
~ ( is_heap_a @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(fact_16_removeLeaf_Osimps_I1_J,axiom,
! [V2: a] :
( ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ V2 @ e_a @ e_a ) )
= ( produc686083979Tree_a @ V2 @ e_a ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl36,plain,
! [X0: a] :
( ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X0 @ e_a @ e_a ) )
= ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X0 @ e_a ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_16_removeLeaf_Osimps_I1_J]) ).
thf(fact_29_snd__conv,axiom,
! [X12: a,X24: tree_a] :
( ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X12 @ X24 ) )
= X24 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
! [X0: tree_a,X1: a] :
( ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_29_snd__conv]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl64,plain,
! [X0: a] :
( ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X0 @ e_a @ e_a ) ) )
= e_a ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl36,zip_derived_cl39]) ).
thf(fact_10_is__heap_Osimps_I1_J,axiom,
is_heap_a @ e_a ).
thf(zip_derived_cl28,plain,
is_heap_a @ e_a,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_10_is__heap_Osimps_I1_J]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl62,zip_derived_cl64,zip_derived_cl28]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ITP071^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LN7rQHoBDY true
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 11:32:21 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.35 % Running in HO mode
% 0.20/0.66 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.20/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.20/0.82 % Solved by lams/40_c_ic.sh.
% 0.20/0.82 % done 10 iterations in 0.052s
% 0.20/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.82
% 0.20/0.82
% 0.20/0.82 % Terminating...
% 0.20/0.91 % Runner terminated.
% 0.20/0.92 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------